#11 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2009, 11:20 PM
Virgin Bonus Whore
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mcleansboro, Illinois
Posts: 29
Default

thank u jsawe someone else who agrees with me. as soon as i found out it was limit it totally made sense. if any play in the hand was a donk play i think it was playing the 89 off. but with it being limit and factoring pot odds in it was justifiable play. if hes going to play the 89 off in limit what else is he going to do but call with straight draw on flop? finally someone who understand limit poker. for the rest of u i recommend hellmuths hold em. it has a very good limit section
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2009, 11:27 PM
JenniferNL's Avatar
ADMINISTRATOR
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SUGAR LAND TX
Posts: 1,939
Default

Brown you are a know it all eh ? You really need to back off here!
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 12:44 AM
JenniferNL's Avatar
ADMINISTRATOR
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SUGAR LAND TX
Posts: 1,939
Default

Ok I will say my say again! Anyone that plays 89 off suit with a preflop raise then I want your book on how to play. Maybe I shouldn't be playing poker????????????????
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 08:38 AM
islandtime2
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Bad luck Jenn but you want calls like this. Acording to Sklansky you should be thrilled to see calls like this and you want to play this person alot but they have to win one once in a while or they would go away. Moan and groan here to get it out of your system and then go pound him back down and just leave my stack alone - remember when I bet I always have the nuts!
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 11:20 AM
JenniferNL's Avatar
ADMINISTRATOR
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SUGAR LAND TX
Posts: 1,939
Default

He didn't last long after so his DONK moves got him a loss in the end.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2009, 11:21 AM
Virgin Bonus Whore
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mcleansboro, Illinois
Posts: 29
Default

WOW! a little testy over nothing. I never said I knew anymore than anyone else. All I have to do is figure out pot odds like anyone else would do. That is the reason why I said at first not enough information was available. Of course playing the 89 off is a bad play nobody is disputing that. But once he limps in late position with the hand, guess what your raise means nothing in limit poker, hes going to call the raise and in turn it kinda build the pot and prices him on flop.
Reply With Quote
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2009, 09:56 PM
Brothel Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 358
Default

Could you both be correct?

I know that I would not take exception to either perspective.
Reply With Quote
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 10-27-2009, 06:50 PM
Brothel Regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 358
Default Clarification

Jsaw's analysis has much empirical validity however its bad business calling bets from Jenn.

Sometimes common sense has to be employed rather than mathematics.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2